They believe Obamacare is the key to winning big in the mid-term
congressional elections next year and expanding their majority in the U.S.
House of Representatives.
Greg Walden, the congressman from Oregon who chairs the
Republican campaign committee in the House, calls Obamacare a “Category 5
political hurricane,” the defining
issue of the 2014 elections.
In a recent New York Times analysis, (“As Troubles Pile Up,
a Crisis of Confidence,” Friday, Nov. 15), Michael D. Shear wrote:
“The difficulties have put Mr. Obama on the defensive at
exactly the moment he might have seized political advantage in a dysfunctional
Washington. If not for the health care
disaster, the two-week shutdown of the government last month would have been an
opportunity for Mr. Obama to sharpen the contrast with Republicans. Democratic lawmakers expressed growing
frustration on Thursday with the opportunities the party had missed to hammer
home the ideological differences between the two parties. The lawmakers say there is intensifying
anxiety within the Democratic caucus that the poor execution of the health care
law could bleed into their 2014 re-election campaigns.”
Most observers, I guess, wouldn’t bet a dollar today that
the Democrats will win enough seats to displace Republicans as the majority in
the House and take the power that comes with majority status. An awesome power it is.
Republicans and Democrats now hold, respectively, 231 and
200 seats in the 435-member House. (Four
seats are vacant.) If every seat in Congress
were filled, Democrats would need at least 218 to form a majority. Can the number of Democrat reps possibly grow
at that rate, 9%, when their party leader, Obama, is struggling to stay on his
feet?
There are two Democrat congressmen from Massachusetts, Jim McGovern
and Richie Neal, who devoutly wish it to be possible. Every Massachusetts citizen who votes as if
his self-interest is his compass should wish similarly.
There’s plenty of time, as it is measured in politics, for
Obama to turn things around, and for his fellow Democrats to gain fortitude and
standing from such a feat. But history
is not on the side of the Democrats.
Usually, the president’s party loses House seats in the mid-terms. When that party does defy the norm and gain seats, it does not usually increase its
numbers by 9% or 10%.
If that were to happen, McGovern and Neal would almost
certainly become the chairs of two of the most powerful committees in Congress,
House Rules and House Ways and Means, respectively.
According to a government-operated website, http://rules.house.gov, the Rules Committee
is “amongst the oldest standing committees in the House” and is “the mechanism
that the Speaker uses to maintain control of the House Floor.” The committee, it says, “has the authority to
do virtually anything during the course of consideration of a measure.”
If you wonder how power like that translates in the real world,
go to Boston and tour the magnificent John Joseph Moakley federal courthouse on
the South Boston waterfront. While
you’re at it, take a walk across the nearby Evelyn Moakley Bridge, the
federally subsidized span that Moakley had named for his wife.
Joe Moakley, the late, beloved congressman from South
Boston, served as chairman of the Rules Committee for years (1989-95) when the
Democrats held sway in the House. He put
a young Jim McGovern on his congressional staff and tutored him in the art of
politics. Jimmy was a quick learner.
When McGovern ran for Congress himself, at age 37, from a
Worcester-based district, Moakley was an unofficial campaign advisor. He welcomed his protégé to the Congressional
club by telling him, “Don’t do something stupid, like run for Senate.” Moakley knew the advantages of remaining
patiently on the ladder of the lower branch -- and the (largely
hidden) value of those advantages.
The aforementioned government website notes that Ways and
Means is the oldest committee of the United States Congress, and is the chief
tax-writing committee in the House.
Taxes equal money. Money
equals power.
Every item of revenue in the U.S. government must
originate in House Ways and Means.
At http://wysandmeans.house.gov/about/history/htm,
it also says that the roster of committee members “who’ve gone on to serve in
higher office is impressive. Eight Presidents and eight Vice Presidents have
served on Ways and Means, as have 21 Speakers of the House of Representatives,
and four Justices of the Supreme Court.”
If you object to House pooh-bahs acting like royalty, if you don't like their indulging their egos by doing things like naming bridges after
their wives, I get it.
But if you object to your home-state congressmen skillfully
beating congressmen from other states at The Capitol games, if you get squeamish when
our pooh-bahs deliver the goods to Massachusetts, as Tip O’Neill did the
federal funds for the Big Dig, I don’t get it.
It may not be pretty.
Not much in politics (or human nature) is.
Practiced within the bounds of law, politics is infinitely preferable
to the other ways power is seized and used in this world.
1 comment:
This piece made me think hard about our political system both nationally and locally and what I like and hate about the system.
Your ending phrase sums it all up quite well, for all its flaws our system is part of who and what we are and what we have made it to be.
Post a Comment