He was the manager for the Massachusetts Registry of Motor
Vehicle (RMV) of the state’s vehicle emissions and safety test program, which
is overseen jointly by the RMV and the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection (MassDEP).
From 1999 to 2008, I was responsible for producing a
quarterly newsletter called “Inspection Update,” working as a subcontractor to
the company that administered the program under a long-term contract with the
state. In that capacity, I reported
directly to Mark LaFrance and to the program manager for the MassDEP.
I always found Mark, who is 51, to be an intelligent,
reasonable, competent and likeable individual.
He knew the vehicle inspection program backwards and forwards. He was decisive and he communicated well. He seemed
to be a popular and respected guy within the RMV. I always appreciated the help he gave me,
which was substantial and continual. Also,
Mark has a sly, off-beat sense of humor, the kind that can make you burst out
laughing at improbable moments. I often
left his office smiling and shaking my head.
In 2008, the company administering the vehicle inspection
program lost its bid for a new state contract.
My company, Preti Minahan Strategies, was working for that company. So when that company lost its bid, we lost
the “Inspection Update” work. After
that, there wasn’t a reason for me to be in touch with Mark and the folks at
MassDEP, although I called him on occasion through the years when I needed
information on one thing or another related to the RMV. He was unfailingly polite and helpful.
On March 11, Mark LaFrance was arrested by agents of the
Boston Field Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation outside the office
building on Newport Road Extension in Quincy, where the RMV rents a lot of
space. I was told that eight agents in
four different cars swooped in as he was leaving work. They surrounded him in the parking lot,
slapped the cuffs on him, and spirited him away for booking. That struck me as overkill. One or two agents would have been more than
enough. Mark is not a wise guy or a tough
guy. I never knew him to carry a weapon
more dangerous than a ballpoint pen.
LaFrance was subsequently indicted on charges related to an
ongoing scheme whereby he allegedly took money from service station owners in
exchange for getting them into the network of stations that conduct the
state-mandated annual inspections, a program currently known as Massachusetts
Vehicle Check.
Because there are more stations that want to do inspections
than there are licenses for performing inspections, the state maintains a waiting
list of qualified applicants. Applicants
are taken from the list in the order in which they were put on it and issued licenses
that have become available on account of the retirement of an inspection
station owner, an owner’s voluntary decision to quit the program, or some other
reason.
Massachusetts Vehicle Check is a mature program with about
1,600 participating stations. Station
owners generally make money on the program, mainly through incidental repairs
that come their way when defects are identified during inspections.
Stations on the waiting list can wait years to get into the
program. For stations way down on the
list, there’s virtually no chance they’ll ever be chosen because there’s so
little turnover.
According to the documents filed in the case by federal
authorities, LaFrance worked with Simon Abou Raad, a station owner from
Tyngsboro, in identifying inspection stations that might be willing to transfer
their licenses to stations on the waiting list through sham mergers. Abou Raad would allegedly negotiate prices
for facilitating the deals. According to
the authorities, when a price was agreed upon, Abou Raad would transfer the
inspection equipment from one station to another, and LaFrance would use his
authority and computer access to make the new owner’s entry into the program
appear to be a routine matter. By these
and other means, it was alleged that LaFrance and Abou Raad collected some
$657,000 over six or seven years.
Mark’s arrest made me realize again the hubris it takes to
make some everyday conclusions, like when we assume we know somebody well. Do we ever know anyone well, or really well?
When somebody I know gets in trouble with the law, my first
reaction is usually, “What was he thinking?”
That’s probably the wrong way to put it.
When I read or hear the details of such a case, I’m usually struck by
the flaws in the scheme and how obvious the flaws are. So I should be saying, “Why did he think he
could get away with it?” Not: “What was he thinking?”
I got a copy of the affidavit filed by one of the FBI agents
involved in the LaFrance-Abou Raad case.
It’s a public record; anybody can get it.
“On February 6, 2012,” the affidavit says, “an FBI
confidential human source (‘CHS’) informed the FBI that it had knowledge that
individuals were paying bribes in order to receive a license to perform
Massachusetts motor vehicle safety inspections.
CHS, who owns two Massachusetts service stations (only one of which is
licensed to conduct vehicle inspections), was informed by an acquaintance and
fellow service station owner that if the CHS wanted to acquire an inspection
box (and license to conduct inspections) for an additional service station, the
CHS would have to negotiate with and pay Abou Raad.”
The agent who wrote and signed the affidavit stated that it was
based, in part, on his “review of intercepted electronic communications,
records, documents, business records and recordings of consensually monitored
conversations.”
In other words, the FBI was bugging LaFrance’s phone and
prying into his email whenever they felt like it.
The fall of Mark LaFrance has obviously been a disaster for him
and his family. The feds have made an
example of him. In August, he pleaded
guilty to mail fraud and conspiracy to extort money “under color of official
right.” On Nov. 22, he was sentenced by
U.S. District Court Judge George A. O’Toole to three years in prison, two years
of supervised release, a $12,500 fine, and forfeiture of $50,000 in illegal
proceeds.
Abou Raad has also pleaded guilty to the charges lodged
against him. I’m guessing that, when
he’s sentenced on Dec. 12, Abou Raad will receive a much lighter sentence than
LaFrance. After all, the station owners who
paid him were eager to make a deal. They
obviously thought the prices were worth it to obtain the benefits of doing
inspections. Abou Raad did not have any
authority to abuse.
LaFrance made a big mistake and is paying a big price. He’s not the devil and is not a threat to
anyone. I can only hope they keep him in
a safe, minimum-security facility. This
is about punishment and deterring corruption in government, I understand, but a
non-violent, first-time offender should not have to fear being harmed when in
prison.
This has been a tough case for the RMV. In the final analysis, however, it’s more
like a small blemish than a large stain.
Authorities estimate that the entire caper involved 10 or so inspection
licenses and/or inspection machines.
Those 10 represent 0.625% of all the inspection stations in the state.
The arrest of Mark LaFrance no doubt felt like a terrible
setback to the people in the RMV when it happened. With the passage of time, its actual negative
impact has been negligible. Today, the
Massachusetts Vehicle Check program is stronger and better, with more
safeguards and more integrity, than it had on March 10, 2013.
ADDENDUM: The sentencing of Simon Abou Raad was postponed to Tuesday, Jan. 21. According to the Office of the U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts, Abou Raad was given three years in prison and two years of supervised release, and was fined $10,000. He was also ordered to forfeit $360,000 in illegal proceeds.
ADDENDUM: The sentencing of Simon Abou Raad was postponed to Tuesday, Jan. 21. According to the Office of the U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts, Abou Raad was given three years in prison and two years of supervised release, and was fined $10,000. He was also ordered to forfeit $360,000 in illegal proceeds.
3 comments:
As I read this I kept thinking of the former President of Westfield State and how angry I was at reading about his, polite word, "hubris". I have a different phrase for the kind of person he is.
Mr. LaFrance is little different in that, as you say, "Why did he think he could get away with it"? If your commentary were published on the front page of the Globe perhaps more of our "trusted" public employees would think twice, or perhaps I should say, take the time to at least think once.
He's right where he belongs....
well deserved for both of them.
Post a Comment