In the fall of 2001, she was elected to the Melrose School
Committee on her first try for public office.
She’d lived in Melrose barely a year then.
On Dec. 10, barring an upset of incredible dimensions, Clark,
a 50-year-old Democrat, will be elected to the U.S. House of Representatives
from the 5th Massachusetts District.
When she takes office shortly thereafter, the youthful Clark
will have gone, in just under 12 years, from representing 28,000 people in one
community to 700,000-plus citizens in 24 communities -- and from the obscurity of an
unpaid school board post to the bright lights of the national stage and a
$3,346-a-week congressional paycheck.
Of course, there were some interesting stops for the Cornell Law
grad in between. She was a key policy
advisor to Attorney General Martha
Coakley and a state rep in a district that included her city, Melrose, and half
of the neighboring town of Wakefield, before moving up to the Massachusetts
Senate in the Fifth Middlesex District, [Malden, Melrose, Wakefield, Stoneham,
Reading and Lynnfield].
Clark was beginning her second senate term earlier this year
when she declared an interest in succeeding Ed Markey in the event Markey ran
for the U.S. Senate seat of John Kerry, who was emerging as President Obama’s
preferred choice for Secretary of State. Markey soon jumped at Kerry’s job, and Clark at Markey’s. She was the first candidate in the Democratic
primary, which proved to be a key advantage in a long race that eventually
attracted six other candidates.
The primary election was held Oct. 15. Clark won going away. Her vote total of 21,983 put her 6,680 votes
ahead of a very formidable, tested, regional candidate, Middlesex County
Sheriff Peter Koutoujian. In the order of finish behind Koutoujian were:
Medford-Somerville state rep Carl Sciortino, Belmont state senator William
Brownsberger, Framingham state senator Karen Spilka, Paul Maisano and Martin
Long. (Maisano and Long have backgrounds
in business.)
The 5th Congressional District stretches from
Winthrop and Revere in the east to Framingham and Ashland in the west, from
Woburn and Lexington in the north to Waltham and Weston in the south. It contains at least nine communities with
populations larger than that of Clark’s Melrose. Some of them, like Arlington, Framingham,
Medford, Malden, Revere and Waltham, are much more populous than Melrose. Also, politics in these places can be much rougher
than the brand usually practiced in the Melroses of the world.
So when a sophomore state senator from out of town manages
to top the ticket in places where she’s never appeared on the ballot before, as
Clark did in Arlington, Medford and Woburn, and to come in second where she's never
been on the ballot before, as she did in Revere, Holliston and Winthrop, she’s showing
a political IQ and a charisma that are almost off the charts.
It has been said that a candidate for President of the
United States demonstrates his capacity for the biggest, most difficult job in
the world, in part, by running a successful campaign. If that is true, a Katherine
Clark has done something similar in her soon-to-be-victorious march to D.C. She designed and put together a large,
expensive campaign apparatus. She raised
a ton of money. She crafted a campaign
theme and message that positioned her well in the field. She enlisted a legion of newfound
allies. She spoke persuasively at countless
rallies and debates. She provided constant inspiration to her campaign
team. She used her time and her
physical/mental/spiritual capabilities to the max. She executed the game plan. Otherwise, she would have lost.
We can believe Clark has the stuff to be a good congresswoman.
When Clark wins on Dec. 10, she’ll be moving to an elite
level of Massachusetts politics.* Today
she's one of 40 state senators and of 200 state legislators overall. By mid-December, she’ll be one of only 9
Massachusetts members of the U.S. House. It has not been an entirely smooth progression. Therein lay clues as to why Clark prevailed
in that seven-person, 24-community Democratic primary.
In 2004, when she’d been on the Melrose School Committee
just two years, Clark ran against the savvy, long-term Republican incumbent in
the Fifth Middlesex senate district, Richard Tisei. She didn’t win but did respectably well. Most significantly, she demonstrated
audacity, (fortune favors the brave), and the wits needed to wage a sprawling, prolonged,
uphill battle against a powerful and popular incumbent. What Clark learned in
2004 obviously helped her to be an effective candidate when she ran for rep in
2007 and senator (again) in 2010.
In 2009-10, Clark put her talents at the disposal of her
former mentor, Martha Coakley, in Coakley’s campaign for U.S. Senate. On the night of the election, Jan. 19, 2010, when
Coakley was sunk under the wave of the Scott Brown campaign, it fell to the
telegenic Clark to be Coakley’s spokesperson to the broadcast media.
Given the shock and gloom of the occasion, she handled the
task better than anyone had a right to expect. Clark was composed, gracious, upbeat,
articulate and credible over the course of multiple, live, on-air interviews. She never wilted, even a tad, in the heat of the
television lights or the awkwardness of explaining the loss to the well-groomed
media bulldogs.
There were certainly pressure-packed occasions for Clark in
the race for the Democratic nomination in the 5th District, but I
can’t imagine many of them matching the media grinder she serenely
entered on 1-19-10 for Coakley.
Ernest Hemingway famously defined courage as “grace under
pressure.” Clark has it. If you want further proof, consider that she
personally borrowed $250,000 and loaned it to her congressional campaign just
before the primary, as she was allowed by law to do. When she’s a congresswoman,
Clark will not have great difficulty raising the money to pay off that loan; had
she lost on Oct. 15, the opposite would be true.
Courage like that helps to explain the velocity of Clark’s career. If she maintains her current speed, it’s not
unrealistic to see the governor’s suite or the U.S. Senate in her future.
*The Massachusetts delegation to the U.S. House has been a veritable breeding ground of House Speakers since the birth of the nation. In the 20th Century alone, four Speakers were congressmen from Massachusetts: Frederick Gillett (1919-25), Joseph W. Martin (1947-49 and 1953-55), John W. McCormack (1961-71), and Thomas P. "Tip" O'Neill (1977-87).
*The Massachusetts delegation to the U.S. House has been a veritable breeding ground of House Speakers since the birth of the nation. In the 20th Century alone, four Speakers were congressmen from Massachusetts: Frederick Gillett (1919-25), Joseph W. Martin (1947-49 and 1953-55), John W. McCormack (1961-71), and Thomas P. "Tip" O'Neill (1977-87).
INTERESTING FACT: Clark will be the first non-resident of Malden
to represent the 5th Massachusetts District in 69
years. Ed Markey held the seat from 1976
to this June, and the late Torby Macdonald had it before Markey, from 1955 to
1976. Markey is, Macdonald was, a
lifelong Malden resident.
ANOTHER INTERESTING
FACT: Clark will be “returning” the 5th District seat to
Melrose. The person who held it before Torby Macdonald was Angier L. Goodwin
(1881-1975), one of the most prominent Melrosians of his day. Goodwin served as Melrose’s mayor, state rep
and state senator before going to the U.S. House (1943-55).
1 comment:
I've been surfing on-line more than three hours nowadays,
but I by no means discovered any attention-grabbing article like yours.
It is pretty worth sufficient for me. Personally, if all site owners and
bloggers made excellent content as you probably did, the internet shall be a lot more useful than ever before.
My web site: We r Movers
Post a Comment