“Appreciate the congrats for being right on radical Islamic
terrorism.”
Ignore for a minute what that says about Trump’s selfishness
and narcissism, which impel him to seek immediate political gain from a mass
murder, and consider what it says about his impulse toward snap decisions on
incomplete evidence. Might this be a
warning sign regarding the character of a potential commander-in-chief?
While the slaughter was unfolding, the gunman had proclaimed
his allegiance to the Islamic State. Within 36 hours, it was revealed that he
had patronized the club on at least several occasions, suggesting that inner
conflicts and turmoil contributed as much to the rampage as distorted religious
convictions may have.
Now consider the former junior United States senator from
Massachusetts, Scott Brown, an early endorser of Trump.
On Monday, June 13, while in the company of Trump in New
Hampshire, Brown told NBC News that he felt “comfortable” with the direction the
campaign was taking. “I’m pleased in the
direction of the campaign. They’re focusing on things that people care about –
the economy, and, obviously, terrorism,” he said.
There’s a man I know in Wakefield, Massachusetts, where
Brown grew up. This man is a
contemporary and lifelong friend of Brown; he and Brown are close friends. I very much respect this person and his
judgment. When he tells me Brown is a good person and a great guy, which he
does, I believe him. Wholeheartedly.
One of the knocks on Brown has always been that he’s more
show than substance. He was a
professional male model in his younger days and remains exceptionally handsome
and buff at age 56. He’s frequently
photographed alongside his glamorous and similarly youthful wife, Gail Huff,
after doing something strenuous and dashing, like competing in a triathalon.
Brown had a so-so career in the Massachusetts House and
Senate. Then he unexpectedly caught fire
in the 2010 Senate campaign against Martha Coakley; was a media superstar for
about a year; then flamed out against Elizabeth Warren when trying for
re-election. Many political pros
dismissed his campaign against Warren as clunky and uninspired.
I have never accepted the notion that Brown is a lightweight.
Someone lacking in intelligence could not have done what
Brown did in pulling himself through -- and up from -- a very hard and
difficult childhood in Wakefield, as detailed in his 2011 memoir, “Against All
Odds.” Many kids who endure similar
hardships never make it out of high school.
A dullard could not have earned degrees from Tufts
University (with honors) and the law school at Boston College, as Brown did, in
1981 and 1985, respectively. While at
Tufts, he further demonstrated quickness of mind on the inter-collegiate basketball
circuit.
So Brown most certainly grasps how offensive Trump is when
he scapegoats immigrants, casts suspicion on all Muslims, treats women as
bimbos, makes fun of the handicapped, encourages people at his rallies to punch
out protesters, etc. Here we have a smart,
savvy, mature man, a moderate Republican who has always worked hard at being
likeable, as most every politician has, a man who’s willing to overlook a lot
of unsavory stuff about Trump even though he knows some of that stuff is
rubbing off on him now and will likely stick to him for years.
One must conclude that Brown really, truly is hoping to become Trump’s choice for
vice president. Speculation to that
effect has been rife for months. Brown
might well see the Trump express as his last ticket to political power and
glory. This small-town kid has always
had within him biggest-town ambition.
Ambition. It’s the explanation behind all other explanations
in everyone who seeks high office.
Brown’s thinking of the vice presidency, meaning he’s
thinking of his chances of becoming president. [FACT: 14 vice presidents have
become president, 8 on the occasion of the death of the sitting president.]
Remember, they called him Downtown Scotty Brown in high
school and college because he had a marvelous way with a long shot.In conclusion, consider the words of President Obama on the afternoon of June 14:
“This is a country founded on basic freedoms, including
freedom of religion. We don’t have
religious tests here. Our founders, our
Constitution, our Bill of Rights are clear about that. And, if we ever abandon those values, we would
not only make it a lot easier to radicalize people here and around the world
but we would have betrayed the very things we were trying to protect: the
pluralism and the openness, our rule of law, our civil liberties. The very things that make this country
great. The very things that make us
exceptional. And then the terrorists
would have won. And we cannot let that
happen. I will not let that happen.”
No comments:
Post a Comment