I began reconsidering that assumption this morning when I
read a Washington Post article on how former Massachusetts governor Mitt
Romney had convened his annual “ideas festival” last night in that one-percenters
heaven, Park City, Utah. The official
name of the Mitt-fest is “Experts and Enthusiasts Summit,” or E2 for
short. (Please tell me you’re surprised
I was not invited.)
The E2 Summit is “not intended to be a political forum,”
according to the Post, “but rather is a Romney-designed version of the Aspen
Ideas Festival.” (Aspen, why don’t you
ever call me?)
The Post article said:
“The E2 summit is the first of what will be many events in
which Republican elites begin to talk and think about a post-Trump era, in the
event he loses to presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. Many of the roughly 300 people assembling at
the five-star Stein Eriksen Lodge Deer Valley for three days of colloquiums and
seminars will be thinking about who might lead their party after November…
“The event comes amid chatter in some Republican circles
about ways to establish party rules that could somehow deny Trump the
nomination at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland next month. Those conversations underscore the continuing
discomfort with Trump, yet have produced nothing concrete, either in terms of a
clear strategy or a consensus alternative candidate.”
If Romney thinks Trump’s a goner, I’m scared. Very scared.
Mitt is an exceptional human being in so many respects but the trait for
politicking is totally absent from his DNA.
On political matters, he has the opposite of “touch.” Recall, please, how he went public March 3 with a scathing attack
on Trump as a “fake” and how Trump promptly went up in the polls.
Juicily, the E2 Summit has led to speculation that folks in
Romney’s camp are hoping to deny the nomination to Trump or to draw Romney
into some new third party kind of try for the presidency this November.
“Romney has steadfastly refused to run again, though the reunion
here of his friends and allies is expected to produce some encouragement from
well-wishers for him to reconsider, as it has the previous two years here,” said
the Post.
A Republican strategist, Rick Wilson, was quoted as saying,
“We’re at the point now where Mitt is the last dog in this fight who can run a
credible third-party effort. There will
be tremendous pressure on him.”
Republicans would be wise to devise a means of stealing the
nomination from Trump and bestowing it on Romney next month. Sure, there’d be a lot of screaming from the
Republican rank and file, roughly 62% of whom voted for Trump in the primaries,
but it would die down in a matter of weeks.
The Trumpophiles would then realize they’d rather have Romney in the
White House than Hillary and Bill again.
With Romney as the standard bearer, the G.O.P. would win
even if Romney lost because it would have been spared the damage to down-ticket
Republican congressional candidates and the irreparable harm to its standing
among minority voters and immigrants that would have resulted from a Trump
candidacy.
On balance, there’s an excellent chance Mitt “Spotless” Romney could match up well in this race against Hillary “Server-in-Home” Clinton.
For a gleeful take on how Republican bigwigs could maneuver
Trump out of the nomination, see an article published yesterday in the online
version of The New Yorker, “How to Feel the G.O.P.’s Pain Over Donald
Trump,” by John Cassidy:
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/how-to-feel-the-g-o-p-s-pain-over-donald-trump
For Cassidy’s benefit, Hugh Hewitt, a conservative radio
talk show host, offered a couple of possible methods (to screw Trump). “One was
to make the first two ballots advisory,” Cassidy writes, “which would allow
delegates who are committed to Trump to switch preferences on the third
ballot. Another was to require a
supermajority of votes on the first ballot, which could conceivably prevent
Trump from scoring a decisive victory.”
Further, Cassidy writes, “Once you grasp the idea that the
G.O.P. conventioneers can make up their own rules, the possibilities seem
endless.”
It is these possibilities that will likely keep Mitt tossing
in his five-star bed this weekend.
Speaking of upright Republicans, I can’t understand why Geoff
Diehl, a G.O.P. state rep from Whitman and a Trump supporter, has entered the fray
as Trump fends off charges – from Republican U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan of
all people – that he, Trump, was racist in his comments about Judge Gonzalo
Curiel. Then again, I can’t understand
why Diehl, a very decent guy and a gentleman in every sense of the word,
decided to support Trump, an obnoxious blowhard and natural-born bully, in the first
place.
In an article today on the State House News Service, (“Diehl
Stands by Trump Following His Comments on Judge”), Diehl was quoted as saying:
“I don’t understand why we talk about Mexico as a race. Mexico is a country. This is a nation. We’re trying to have a secure border along
the Mexican border, right? He’s talking
about the potential bias of the judge who’s worked clearly with LaRaza (a Latino
lawyers association in California), who has efforts to try to get people into
America.”
No comments:
Post a Comment