On Tuesday voters there decisively rejected Smith’s bid to regain his old seat in the Massachusetts House, a position he was forced from in 2012 by the U.S. Attorney because he’d abused the absentee ballot process.
Smith paid a $20,000 fine, was sentenced to four months in federal prison, and banned from running for public office again for a period of five years. That ban was up in April.
Within days Smith was asking his townspeople to sign nomination
papers to put him on the September 4 ballot in the Democratic primary for
representative in the 28th Middlesex District. He amassed more than 500 signatures in one
weekend -- many multiples of the required number.
Smith ran an energetic, high-visibility campaign throughout
the spring and summer. He persuaded
untold hundreds of Everett homeowners to put signs up promoting his
candidacy. You could not go a tenth of a
mile without seeing a Stat Smith sign.
Smith even snagged the editorial endorsement of the newspaper of record,
the Everett Leader Herald!
It was all for naught.
When the votes were tallied Tuesday night, Smith was dead
last behind the incumbent representative, Joe McGonagle, a well-liked and
effective figure at the State House, and Gerly Adrien, a woman highly qualified
for public office. The results were: McGonagle, 1,968; Adrien, 1,800; Smith, 893.
With no Republican opponent in November, McGonagle’s a lock
for another term.
Smith was elected to the House three times. I often bumped into him at the State House
during his years there, 2007-2012. He
was a long-time friend of my late brother-in-law, Joe Curnane, Jr. Joe thought the world of him. Stat and I never had trouble finding
something to talk about. He was a good
Everett guy, easy to like. I liked him.
But I believe Smith’s guilty plea made him permanently
undeserving of a vote for public office, any office. Voting is the essence of a free and just democratic
society. Our system of government
demands that the ballot be kept sacrosanct.
That is not to say Smith should never re-enter public life
in some role, say as a member of the board of health or as a library trustee, or
that he should be shunned in the community.
Smith paid the price for his crimes, two misdemeanor counts of voter
fraud, and deserves every good chance at forgiveness and redemption -- as long
as he isn’t trying to redeem himself, that is, through the local ballot box.
My first reaction to his candidacy was that Smith did not
have a prayer. Then I witnessed the
steady proliferation of Smith house signs and started thinking, maybe I am
missing something?
I kept expecting to see an ad in the local papers – there are
three weeklies in Everett – or a flyer from the McGonagle or Adrien camps
calling Smith out for having been a jailbird.
If such was produced, it escaped me.
Smith was getting a pass on his biggest weakness as a candidate!
I never expected to see a Leader-Herald editorial endorsing
Smith. When it appeared just before the primary, on Thursday, August 30, the
thought crossed my mind that the momentum might be shifting Smith’s way. I braced
for a Stat comeback.
Turns out I worried needlessly.
On Tuesday the voters of Everett restored my faith in
humanity. There’s a proverb that holds, “The
judgment of the village is never wrong.”
Everett has a population of well over 50,000 but it is still like a village
in many respects. Everybody knows
everybody.
Sitting on my desk is a copy of the pro-Smith editorial,
headlined simply, “Smith for Rep.” I
read it again before starting to write this post. Again, I marveled at how well it says basically
nothing. It has the feel of having come
from the keyboard of a conscript whose heart wasn’t in it. Here are three typical lines, followed by my
comments in italic type…
“We believe he is the best choice because he is willing to
work, and to work hard.” 80 percent of the Everett population qualifies
for the legislature on that basis.
“Steven Smith has overcome trials and tribulations in his
life.” Where’s the person in Everett who, at 63 years (Smith’s age), has not
overcome?
“He has worked hard and smart.” Except, of course, for that little absentee ballot caper.
“Smith for Rep” was written simply, which is usually a
virtue in writing. Had the Leader Herald
wished to attain an even purer form of simplicity, it could have gone with a two-sentence editorial along these lines: Yes, folks, a good smile has long been an element of success on Beacon Hill. Stat gets our vote because he brushes and flosses.
No comments:
Post a Comment