I thought of my friend’s comment on Wednesday morning of this
week as I was standing outside the Social
Security office in the lobby of the Tip O’Neill federal building, 10 Causeway
Street, Boston. My wife and I were in
line, waiting to be called for an appointment I had set up to discuss her
eligibility for Medicare. (Yes, damn it,
we’re getting to “that age.”)
Against my better instincts, I fell into a conversation with
an old gent standing behind me who instantly tried to learn if I was a Trump
supporter. “Which one do you like?” he
pressed. The skeptical look on his face
suggested he’d pegged me as a Hillary man.
“Neither,” said I. That was enough to keep him friendly.
Meanwhile, my wife started kibitzing with a together-looking
woman of approximately my wife’s age, who was in line ahead of her. The woman was with a muscular man on the younger side of middle age who
turned out to be her son. She shared
that her son was pursuing a Supplemental Security Income (SSI) disability,
(which in MA has a state component, in addition to a larger federal component),
and that she was there to attest to the details of his medical history,
including a recent (ostensibly minor) stroke. A six-footer who had his back to
me most of the time, the son was standing straight and tall. He used neither a
cane nor crutches.
My wife has always had the effortless ability to elicit from
strangers some of their deepest thoughts and fears. She never pumps people; they just tell her
things. In less than five minutes on Wednesday, she learned that the son was 40
years old and had struggled for years with an addiction to narcotics, which had
contributed to his health problems and convinced him that he now was
incapable of ever holding down a job.
I obviously do not know enough about that man’s situation to
say he does not deserve SSI. I am not a
physician and thus have no standing to disagree with any medical professional
who would be willing to certify that the man’s drug use had destroyed his
health and rendered him incapable of gainful employment.
That will not discourage me, however, from opining that the
possibility alone of obtaining SSI encourages someone like that 40-year-old man
to throw himself on the mercy of the federal and state governments rather than test
his mettle again in the job market.
We definitely need to have SSI for disabled persons, but we
provide that humane support at the unquestionable risk of attracting considerable
numbers of persons who are kind of ill and kind of debilitated, and who have
lost the drive, the wherewithal, to fend for themselves, and who, in that state
of loss, have convinced themselves no further struggle of a moral nature is
required of them and that they are within their rights to partake of the
resources of the government for the rest of their lives, which, given the
ever-improving capabilities of medical science and all of the material comforts
America offers its citizens, could easily last for 30 or 40 more years.
I should note that no disabled person will ever live well on
SSI alone. The standard monthly federal benefit
for an individual is now $733, while the program’s monthly state benefit for an
individual is $114. Who can go far on $847 a month?To anyone reading this who says my opinion is too large and heavy to rest on the flimsy scaffolding of a quick, disjointed encounter in a Social Security line, I would answer, Yes, you are correct: I have no idea whether that man will ever secure SSI. He may, in fact, have no chance of that; however, I do know personally of at least two individuals who wrecked themselves when young on alcohol and drugs and who are now collecting SSI, so I know this is indeed a viable option today for the booze-scarred, the heroin-wasted and the oxycodone-crazed. “Success” on this score inspires others -- where one goes smoothly down the SSI route, three will surely follow.
I believe in the Commonwealth with a capital C. And Franklin Roosevelt, the father of Social
Security, is my all-time political hero. I believe we are our brother’s keeper. I also believe that, after we keep him
intact during worst part of his life, we should aim to return him to the wild
as soon as possible.
Last night, as I rode the Orange Line home, I was thinking
about if I should, and how I might, write this post when my eyes drifted to a
woman sitting in a wheelchair by one of the car doors. I hadn’t seen her until the crowd thinned, as
it usually does on the Orange Line during evening rush hour, at Wellington
Station, Medford. Like most of the
commuters aboard that train, she looked a little tired. Yet fatigue could not
obscure her essential grit. Her chin was
set a little high; her lips were just shy of a grimace. The woman’s clothes were those of a typical
middle-aged, white collar, working woman in Boston today. She looked to be about 40 years of age. She made my decision for me.
No comments:
Post a Comment