What is it about the Juliette Kayyems of the world that
keeps them from ever considering a run for sheriff? What compels them, as she is now compelled,
to seek the top job in Massachusetts politics, governor, on her first try at
politics? The obvious answer is they
believe they’re at least as well qualified as anybody else who wants the job, and
they have the confidence to put that belief to the test.
Kayyem, who is 44 years old, has reason enough to be
confident. A graduate of Harvard
University (1991) and Harvard Law School (1995), she has been an advisor to U.S.
Attorney General Janet Reno, a member of the National Commission on Terrorism, a
homeland security advisor to Governor Deval Patrick, in which capacity she
oversaw the Massachusetts National Guard; a member of President Obama’s
transition team, and an Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental Affairs at
the federal Department of Homeland Security.
She’s also been a lecturer at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, a
member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and a columnist for the Boston
Globe. Last year, she was a finalist for
the Pulitzer Prize in journalism for a series of articles she wrote on allowing
women soldiers to fight in combat. Then
there’s Kayyem’s marvelous family: she’s married to David J. Barron, a fellow
Harvard and Harvard Law grad, whose nomination by President Obama for a judgeship
on U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit, is pending before the U.S.
Senate. Juliette and David have three
children they’re raising in Cambridge.
I went to see Kayyem this past Wednesday at a forum
sponsored by the Rappaport Center at Suffolk University Law School. She spoke for about 20 minutes and took
questions for 45 minutes or so. I liked
how she delved into every subject with unselfconscious enthusiasm. She was very knowledgeable, articulate, and
engaging. Her physical presence is
strong: she’s tall and thin, with long, dark hair and big, bright, warm
eyes. She appears to be a dynamo at the
height of her powers, a force of nature.
Yes, she’s got charisma.
It’s hard not to like Juliette Kayyem.
If you look at her campaign web site, it’s hard not to be
impressed by the breadth of her campaign platform, and the degree to which she
has thought out the issues, which she identifies as: reforming the criminal
justice system, honoring veterans, finding opportunities for business growth in
solutions to climate change, providing education “from birth to career,”
growing the economy through a “connective infrastructure,” ensuring women’s
health and workplace economy, and reinvigorating the state’s “Gateway Cities.”
If I had any criticism of Kayyem’s performance at Suffolk,
it's that her answers were too long, so long in some instances that she was
far from the point of origin by the time she finished. With an affirming kind of audience before
her, she could not resist the urge to over-communicate.
I’d also say that she has to be careful to avoid comments
and asides that may grate on people who will never be able to afford a place in
Cambridge, which is to say most of the voters in statewide elections. Kayyem was rolling along the other day when
she happened to mention in the middle of an answer that her husband had been
nominated for a federal judgeship, which had caused one-half of the Kayyem-Barron union to observe (and the
other half obviously to agree): “The higher we
go, the less we make.”
It was a throwaway line, barely noticed in the torrent of
her policy-speak. But, if Kayyem were to
win (by some incredibly fortunate series of events) the Democratic
gubernatorial nomination, it's the kind of comment that could come back to
bite her. I don’t know anyone who’s ever
going to feel sorry for a federal judge and his high-achieving, Harvard-lawyer
spouse.
The danger of being perceived as an elitist is, overall, the
greatest threat to the Kayyem candidacy.
If she gets the nomination, some pundit or pontificator is bound to dig
up that old William F. Buckley, Jr., quote and hurl it at her like a grenade --
you know, the one where Buckley said: “I’d
rather entrust the government of the United States to the first 400 people in
the Boston telephone directory than to the faculty of Harvard University.”
Kayyem, however, has two more immediate problems. First, she has to get 15% of the vote at the
Democratic nominating convention to qualify for the September primary
ballot. Then, she has to face off, most
likely, against a seasoned campaigner like Martha Coakley or Steve Grossman.
Coakley started small in politics, running for a Dorchester seat
in the Massachusetts House and losing, and subsequently running for Middlesex
District Attorney and Massachusetts Attorney General (successfully), U.S. Senate
(unsuccessfully), and Attorney General again (successfully). Sam Rayburn would appreciate her paying her
political dues.
The Democratic primary would be Coakley’s fourth time on a
statewide ballot and Kayyem’s first.
Pondering that possibility, Kayyem is no doubt heartened by the fact
that: (a) one of her mentors, Deval Patrick, won the governor’s job in his
first-ever run for office, (b) Patrick beat Massachusetts Attorney General Tom
Reilly for the nomination, and (c) attorneys general more often fail than not
when trying to move up to the governor’s suite.
Historically in the U.S., AG is not a great springboard to governor.NOTE: The U.S. Senate confirmed Kayyem's husband, David J. Barron, as a justice of the First Circuit Court of Appeals on May 22, 2014. The court hears appeals from the U.S. District Courts for the districts of Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico and Rhode Island.
No comments:
Post a Comment